Source Description:
The dimensions for the CS10 CivaString 1, 2 are taken from the studies by Rivard et al 1 and Reed et al 2. The CivaString family of sources are available in lengths of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 mm, and referred to as CS10 to CS50. The CivaString sources are identical to the CivaThin sources, except their outer diameter is a little larger. Encapsulation for the CS10 CivaString source is made of organic polymer material with a mass density of 1.15 g/cm3 and weight fractions of 8.5%, 64.8%, 5.0%, and 21.7%, of H, C, N, and O, respectively. The outer diameter of the source is 0.850 mm. The ends are sealed as a solid cylinder (diameter 0.850 mm). The CS10 source consists of a cylindrical Au marker with a diameter of 0.250 mm and a length of 0.80 mm. It is centered along the length of the source with a 0.0550 mm offset between the cylindrical axis of the Au marker and the cylindrical axis of the organic polymer. Two 103Pd regions are located on either side of the Au marker (overall four regions) centered at longitudinal distances of ±1.665 mm and ±3.885 mm offset from the source center. Each region is simulated similar to an isoceles trapezoidal prism with long and short bases of lengths 2.10 mm and 1.940 mm, and a height and a width of 0.250 mm and 0.280 mm, respectively. Each region has a rectangular cross section, and there is a 0.0350 mm distance between the longitudinal axis of each region and the central axis of the organic polymer. Each Pd region is modeled with 5% weight fractions of natural Pd (~8 μg of Pd) and 95% of organic polymer (H=0.08075, C=0.6156, N=0.0475, O=0.20615, Pd=0.05). The Au marker and each region are fixed in the organic polymer encapsulation without any air space. The overall source length is 10.90 mm and the active length is 10.0 mm. The mean photon energy calculated on the surface of the source is 20.59 keV with mean statistical uncertainties < 0.01% .
Dose-Rate Constant - Λ :
Dose-rate constants, Λ , are calculated by dividing the dose to water per history in a (0.1 mm)3 voxel centered at the reference position, (1 cm,Π/2), in the 30x30x30 cm3 water phantom, by the air-kerma strength per history (scored in vacuo either in a detector 2.363x2.363x0.001 cm3 which subtends the same solid angle of the NIST WAFAC detector or in a small point detector, 0.1x0.1x0.001 cm3). Paxton et al 3 show that, for geometrical reasons, the NIST WAFAC cannot directly measure the air-kerma strength for long sources (> 1 cm) because some photons would create charge outside the charge collecting region. Nonetheless, assuming WAFAC or VAFAC measurements deliver the air-kerma averaged over their front surface, kr2 corrections are necessary to convert the average kerma on the WAFAC/VAFAC detector’s front surface to the kerma on the axis, as required for determining the air-kerma strength. We have determined kr2 corrections by calculating the average kerma per history in a thin (0.001 cm) circular (radius = 1.333 cm) detector/voxel located 10 cm from the source's axis for a series of point sources off-axis and comparing to the kerma per history in a small point detector (0.1x0.1x0.001 cm3) on the axis. The detector covered the same solid angle as the NIST WAFAC 4, 5 or UW VAFAC 3 detectors at 30 cm. The values of kr2 for line sources are then determined by integrating the corrections as a function of the point source distance off-axis. The values obtained are 1.0094,1.0092, 1.0090, 1.0086, and 1.0084 for a point source, 1 cm, 2 cm, 4 cm and 5 cm line sources, respectively. For a point source on axis these values are comparable with the analytic value of 1.0094 (square detector) or 1.0090 (circular detector)6. MC uncertainties in the table are statistical uncertainties only (k=1).
Radial dose function - g(r):
The radial dose function, g(r), is calculated using both line and point source geometry functions and tabulated at 36 different radial distances ranging from 0.19 cm to 10 cm. Fit parameters for a modified polynomial expression are also provided 9. The mean residual deviations from the actual data for the best fit were < 0.17%. The supplementary data of Ref. 1 are used in the g(r), and F(r, Θ) comparisons.
| Fitting coefficients for g L (r) = (a0 r-2 + a1 r-1 + a2 + a3r + a4r2 + a5 r3) e-a6r | |||
| Fit range | Coefficients | ||
| r min (cm) | r max (cm) | ||
| 0.06 | 10.00 | a0 / cm2 | (1.626+/-0.035)E-03 |
| a1 / cm | (-8.37+/-0.07)E-02 | ||
| a2 | (1.7078+/-0.0032)E+00 | ||
| a3 / cm-1 | (4.27+/-0.07)E-01 | ||
| a4 / cm-2 | (-5.47+/-0.04)E-02 | ||
| a5 / cm-3 | (4.34+/-0.07)E-03 | ||
| a6 / cm-1 | (6.991+/-0.026)E-01 | ||
Anisotropy function - F(r,θ):
Anisotropy functions are calculated using the line source approximation and tabulated at radii of 0.1, 0.15, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7.5 and 10 cm and 32 unique polar angles with a minimum resolution of 5° . The anisotropy factor, φan (r), was calculated by integrating the solid angle weighted dose rate over 0° ≤ ϑ ≤ 90° .
F(0.50,θ)  |
F(1.00,θ) |
|
F(3.00,θ) |
F(5.00,θ) |
|
F(7.50,θ) |
Tabulated data:
Tabulated data are available in .xlsx format: Excel
References:
1. M. J. Rivard et al , 103Pd strings: Monte Carlo assessment of a new approach to brachytherapy source design, Med. Phys., 41 , 011716-11, 2014.
2. J. L. Reed et al , Experimental and Monte Carlo dosimetric characterization of a 1 cm 103Pd brachytherapy source, Brachytherapy, 13 , 657-667, 2014.
3. A.B. Paxton, W.S. Culberson, L.A. DeWerd, and J.A. Micka, Primary calibration of coiled brachytherapy sources, Med. Phys. 35, 32-38,2 008
4. R. Loevinger, Wide-angle free-air chamber for calibration of low-energy brachytherapy sources, Med. Phys., 20 , 907, 1993.
5. S. M Seltzer et al , New National Air-Kerma-Strength Standards for 125I and 103Pd Brachytherapy Seeds, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol.,108,337-358,2003.
6. D. W. O. Rogers, Inverse square corrections for FACs and WAFACs, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 153, 108638 (8pp), 2019.
7. H. Safigholi, M. J. P. Chamberland, R. E. P. Taylor, C. H. Allen, M. P. Martinov, D. W. O. Rogers, and R. M. Thomson, Update of the CLRP TG-43 parameter database for brachytherapy, to be published (Current calculation).
8. M. J. Rivard et al , Supplement 2 for the 2004 update of the AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: Joint recommendations by the AAPM and GEC-ESTRO, Med. Phys., 44 , e297-e338, 2017.
9. R. E. P. Taylor, D. W. O. Rogers, More accurate fitting of 125I and 103Pd radial dose functions, Med. Phys., 35 , 4242-4250, 2008.
Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics
CLRP TG-43 Parameter Database V2
May 5, 2020