Black is the Colour ......


So how did it all begin?

The water beetle was sent on an exploration, and after darting about on the surface and finding no rest, it dived down to the depths, whence it brought up a bit of mud, from which the earth grew by accretion. Apache Creation Myth


But most of the time we'll be talking about clusters of galaxies: this is VIrgo.

typically 1 million billion (1015) Msun and a size of 2 Mpc (1022 m)


Redshift:

In 1928, Slipher-Hubble-Humason found light from most galaxies is redshifted.
Hubble found vel. of recession ∝ distance \color{red}{v = Hd,H = 70{\rm{ km/s/Mpc}}}

1 Mpc (megaparsec) = 3x1022 m.

Note although all galaxies are receding from us, does not imply we are at the centre: in the currant cake model all currants see all the others as receding


Big Bang (once over lightly)

RULE 1 in Physics 100: Never mix your units!)
\color{red}{ \begin{array}{l} H = 70 \times 1000/3 \times 10^{22} \approx 2 \times 10^{ - 18} s^{ - 1} \\ \Rightarrow \frac{1}{H} \approx 5 \times 10^{17} {\rm{ s }} \approx 17 \times 10^9 {\rm{ yrs.}} \\ \end{array}}

What does this time represent?

Must be age of universe: if expansion does not change

i.e. 17x109 yr. ago, all the galaxies were in the same place. Universe had a beginning, implied by the big bang. Can run Hubble expansion back: we would like to use this to predict what will happen in the end

face face face face face

Where was the Big Bang?


What's going to happen in the end?

The sky becomes black, Earth sinks into the sea From Heaven fall the bright stars The sea ascends in storm to Heaven It swallows the Earth, the air becomes sterile

From the Hyndluljod (Iceland)

How can we tell if the universe will expand forever?

As a model, consider this as an escape velocity problem. How hard do we need to throw a galaxy on the "outside" so that it escapes? Note: our calculation had better not depend on r!
\color{red}{ \frac{1}{2}mv^2 - \frac{{GMm}}{r} = 0}
but
 v = Hr

and the total mass of the universe inside

M = /3 ρ r³

so...
H²r² = 2G/3 ρ r²

(we got lucky: the r cancels out!). We can turn this round and write it as an equation for ρ

\color{red}{ \rho _0 = \frac{{3H^2 }}{{8\pi G}}}

Hence the critical density

ρ₀ ~ 9 x 10-27 kg m-3 ~ 6 Hydrogen Atoms m-3 (Number is flaky). We'll use \color{red}{\Omega {\rm{ = }}\frac{\rho }{{\rho _0 }}} , because some errors cancel out.


The entire future of the universe is given by this one number!!!!!!!!!

(and isn't it nice that the end of the universe is defined by Omega Ω!)

So if

  • Ω > 1 Universe come to nasty end in ~ 50 x 109 yr.
  • Ω = 1 Universe expansion slows down asymptotically : "critical universe"
  • Ω < 1₀ Universe expands forever
  • More important:we live forever if Ω ≤ 1, (well maybe).

So how do we weigh the universe?

There is still a big dark mystery out there

There is only a single God, Mixcoatl, whose image they possess, but they believe in another, invisible, god, not represented by any image, called Yoalli Ehecatl, That is to say, God Invisible, Impalpable, Beneficent, Protector, Omnipotent by whose strength alone...rules all things

Nahuatlan Myth

Can only see luminous matter: how much Dark Matter is there? Usually expressed as mass to luminosity ratio, relative to the sun.

First Guess: What you see is what you get!

Count number of galaxies in a region of space, assume they consist of stars much like the sun, so assume

\color{red}{ \frac{M}{L} = \frac{{M_o }}{{L_o }}}
Obviously must average over large enough volume such that universe is smooth R > 100 Mpc, and the universe is a very lumpy place!

=> Density:
\color{red}{ \Omega \approx .002}

(Note all these numbers are uncertain to ∼ 20%!)

We live forever!!!
But wait a moment...

How much matter is there we that we can't see? This assumes ρdm ~ 0

Masses of Spiral galaxies

direct observation i.e. measurement of velocities of individual stars in nearby => rotation curves or measurement of hydrogen via 21cm line or estimates of no. of stars
Typical Spiral (NGC3198) R ≈ 20 kpc but outer parts are just seen as H gas

Luminosity of galaxy should reflect mass
Most of the light is fairly concentrated, so this should be good approx to the mass.

but the outside part of the galaxy is rotating far to fast: i.e. velocity curve doesn't drop as expected. Means a lot of mass in outside part of galaxy


For spirals
\color{red}{ \frac{{10M_o }}{{L_o }} < \frac{M}{L} < \frac{{40M_o }}{{L_o }}}

Implication: Mass of observed galaxy ≈ 1010 M₀, R ≈ 2 kpc (for core)
Mass of halo ≈ 1013M₀, R ≈ 100kpc (except that we can't measure out there!)

\color{red}{ \Omega \approx .05}

What do we mean by mass of galaxy? In fact the visible part of the galaxy may just reflect the dark matter.


Large clusters of galaxies:

  • Can measure speeds of individual galaxies in a cluster:
  • faster moving galaxies imply more mass in cluster
  • This gives much higher masses than individual spirals
  • \color{red}{ \frac{M}{L} \approx 300\frac{{M_o }}{{L_o }}}

A check: Large clusters contain a lot of hot gas, which is strong X-ray source

X-ray pictures measure density and temp:


Also large clusters show gravitational lensing, can get quantitative estimate
For Abell 2218 (z = .18) again
\color{red}{ \frac{M}{L} \approx 300\frac{{M_o }}{{L_o }}}
M ≈ 1015 M₀  ⇒ Υ = 300Υ₀
so we seem to have
\color{red}{ \Omega \sim .2}
i.e. there at least 100 times as much dark matter as luminous matter
Combination of lensing (blue) and X-rays (red) in the bullet cluster:

X-ray emitting material is gas: gets stopped in collision dark matter gets carried along


a) What the hell? i.e. what is the dark matter?

b) Why the hell? i.e. why is Ω~1 (after all it could be anything?)

Actually, there is a limit

Ω < 3 

otherwise the universe would be younger than the earth (wouldn't that make the creationists happy!!)


What the hell:

  1. Brown dwarfs
  2. Hydrogen gas
  3. Jupiters
  4. Hydrogen rain
  5. Low surface brightness galaxies
  6. Maxi Black holes
  7. Mini Black holes
  8. Neutrinos
  9. He H +
  10. Modified 1/r² law
  11. Axions
  12. Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPS)
  13. Magnetic Monopoles
  14. Majorons
  15. Photinos
  16. E8 shadow matter
  17. Cosmic Strings
Which is it? We don't know! However, all of the above have problems.
The Generic Candidates for Dark Matter :
  1. Baryonic (BDM): (we use this as shorthand for "ordinary matter") maybe in some odd form e.g. rocks
  2. Hot (HDM) light particles e.g. ν's
  3. Cold (CDM): heavy (usually) particles e.g. WIMPs

What the hell:


No-Nameons: CDM candidates

Although these are similar cosmologically, they are very different from the point of view of detection.


WIMPS


Generic WIMPS can be seen "in vivo" via a variety of low temp. expts.
e.g. Queens-U de Montreal Picasso expt. Nucleus will recoil and transfer energy to super-heated freon liquid and cause transition to gas.

In solid, nucleus will recoil and transfer energy to lattice, flipping superconductor or sending off ballistic phonons. DEAP (Kevin Graham): will use 1 tonne of liquid argon.

Where did the galaxies come from?

There is confirmation of the general CDM/WIMP picture from the microwave background measurements: fossil light shows us what the universe was like 300,000 years after the Big Bang
Before galaxies form, Universe is filled with fluid of radiation and matter.
Hence Scenario
face face face face face

Dark Energy

And just when you thought it was safe to go out at night....

Luminosity distance "standard candle"

If Luminosity is known, then flux is \color{red}{ f = \frac{L}{{4\pi d_L^2 }}}
Type 1a Supernovae Mv = -20 allows us to measure out to 3000Mpc

Hence importance of 1a supernovae: since we know (maybe) L, we can get $q_0$ directly.

CFHT

Canada-France Hawaii Telescope (CFHT)

SuperNova Legacy Survey

(U of T and others) now provides best data from CFHT

implies a cosmological constant Λ (Einstein's "fudge factor"): in other words vacuum has an energy.

What can dark energy be?

List of all well-motivated models for dark energy
The implication is that the expansion of the universe is accelerating: q₀,< 0(!) Combining this with data from WMAP gives so finally
  • ΩM = 0.27 ± .02
  • ΩΛ = 1 - ΩM
  • w = -1.02±.1
  • This gives a "best guess" due to Michael Turner
  • note that ν is highly uncertain: could be massless, could have m = 1eV

However, there are major problems (what, more?).

Statutory Warnings

All of this depends on the assumption that type 1a SN are always the same at 4x109 Lo, even at z = .5. Effect disappears if some (unknown) effect reduces L by 30%

Summary

So......